 |
Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP5 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 610701 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 304 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 148 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
