 |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 293982 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 6841 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 248 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 459 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 4.84 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 800MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
