 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Ultimate benchmark testing data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Apple A13 Bionic.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
