 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Detailed compare data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
