 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Detailed compare data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G78AE.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 732270 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19040 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2652 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 92.62 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
