 |
Mali-G57 MC3 at 650 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Quadrant, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Neocore, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MC3 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 650 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 3 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 320761 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 7230 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 512 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 398 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.4 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MC3 @ 650MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 9
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
