 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Full comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
