 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP6 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Full compare data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G57 MP6 @ 850MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G57 MP6.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G57 MP6 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G57 MP6 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 368142 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 11933 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 846 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 598 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 10.2 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP6 @ 850MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
