 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Full comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G610 MC3.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 3 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 586434 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19875 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1008 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2208 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 84 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC3 @ 600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
