 |
Mali-G68 MP2 at 950 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP2 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 398642 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 928 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2876 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 132 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP2 @ 950MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
