 |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PassMark, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G76 3EEMC4 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 900 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 296060 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8159 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 516 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 5.45 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
