|
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022 Extreme benchmark testing data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G68 MP6.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz comparison
| |
|
Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz |
Frequency | 3460 MHz | 700 MHz | Cores | 5 | 24 | Shaders | 0 | 0 | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 589642 | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 0 | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 684 GFloPS | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2120 MT/s | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 96 GP/s | DirectX | 12 | 11 | Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP6 @ 700MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
| |
|