 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP10 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Detailed comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP10.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 640085 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 854 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 1896 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 68 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP10 @ 700MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
