 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP22 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Maximum benchmark examination data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the GPU are in games Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP22.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 22 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 685362 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19078 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 986 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2245 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 79 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP22 @ 650MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
