Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz
|GPU comparisons 14-09-2022|
Full comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, Geekbench 5, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Samsung Xclipse 920.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz comparison
|Spec||Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz
||Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz|
|Frequency||3460 MHz||500 MHz|
|Lithography||4 nm||4 nm|
|GFloPS||3200 GFloPS||2124 GFloPS|
|Triangle Fillrate||1320 MT/s||1800 MT/s|
|Pixel Fillrate||42 GP/s||64 GP/s|
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.