 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G78 MP14 at 700 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, GTA etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G78 MP14.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 700 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 24 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 679373 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 16621 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 976 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2146 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 72 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78 MP14 @ 700MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
