 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Adreno 662 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Adreno 662 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Adreno 662.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Adreno 662 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Adreno 662 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 512 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 887224 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 30205 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1698.29 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 1742 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 16.91 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Adreno 662 @ 800MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
