 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G610 MP6 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Detailed compare data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G610 MP6.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 568246 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 18436 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 912 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2064 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 72 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MP6 @ 600MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
