 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Adreno 690 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Extreme benchmark testing data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Adreno 690 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Adreno 690.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Adreno 690 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Adreno 690 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 512 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 368469 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 11569 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 740 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 340 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 9 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Adreno 690 @ 600MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
