 |
Mali-G615 MC2 at 1100 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2024
Maximum benchmark testing data of Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Geekbench 6, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, Antutu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 MC2 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 1100 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 709246 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 256540 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 1856 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3956 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 165 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
