 |
Maleoon 910 at 750 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-10-2023
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Maleoon 910 @ 750MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Maleoon 910 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Maleoon 910 @ 750MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Maleoon 910 @ 750MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 790875 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 2056 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 4024 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 148 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Maleoon 910 @ 750MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
