 |
Immortalis-G715 MC16 at 750 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2022
Full comparison data of Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Immortalis-G715 MC16 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1268278 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 33860 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2600 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 124 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Immortalis-G715 MC16 @ 750MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
