 |
Mali-G615 MC2 at 1100 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 29-10-2024
Full comparison data of Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Vellamo, Geekbench 6, PassMark, Antutu v10, 9, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 MC2 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 1100 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 709246 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 256540 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1856 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3956 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 165 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 MC2 @ 1100MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 5
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
