 |
Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 10-01-2021
Hardcore benchmark testing data of Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G57 MP4 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 600 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 16 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 346612 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 8203 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 386 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 6.4 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 0
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
