 |
Mali-G610 MC4 at 700 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 18-03-2023
Comprehensive compare data of Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G610 MC4 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 671986 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19875 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1176 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2576 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 98 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G610 MC4 @ 700MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
