 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G77 MP8 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Full compare data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G77 MP8.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 410872 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 12714 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 628 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 1486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 52 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MP8 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
