 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Adreno 642L at 550 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Ultimate benchmark examination data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Adreno 642L @ 550MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Adreno 642L.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Adreno 642L @ 550MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Adreno 642L @ 550MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 550 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 0 | | Shaders | 0 | 512 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 507648 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 16978 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 906.58 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 391 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 10.63 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Adreno 642L @ 550MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
