 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 at 650 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Vellamo, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G710 MP16.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 650 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 16 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 738743 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 20145 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 1174 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 2648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 92 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP16 @ 650MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
