 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
