 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Full compare data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or PowerVR BXM-8-256.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 256 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 489653 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 19845 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 642 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
