 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G77 MP11 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Comprehensive compare data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G77 MP11 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Vellamo, and how good the GPU are in games Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G77 MP11.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G77 MP11 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G77 MP11 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 11 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 510017 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 13737 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 1874 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 68 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MP11 @ 800MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
