 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PassMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 192 | 0 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
