 |
Mali-G710 MP07 at 850 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 07-10-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G710 MP07 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 850 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 796874 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 20145 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1535.23 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3463 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 120.31 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G710 MP07 @ 850MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
