 |
Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic at 2600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-08-2021
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MC4 or Apple A13 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Shaders | 128 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 509737 | 506152 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12756 | 17314 | | | | | GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | 786 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 560 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 13.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic @ 2600MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
