 |
Apple M2 at 3490 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 20-10-2022
Full comparison data of Apple M2 @ 3490MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple M2 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Apple M2 @ 3490MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple M2 @ 3490MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 3490 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 5 | | Shaders | 2560 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 1376892 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 52258 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 3600 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1482 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M2 @ 3490MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
