 |
Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Extreme benchmark examination data of Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PCMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP5 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 610701 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 304 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 148 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
