 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Apple M1 at 3200 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Apple M1 @ 3200MHz, which GPU is better. Detailed comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Madout2, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Apple M1.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Apple M1 @ 3200MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Apple M1 @ 3200MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 3200 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 8 | | Shaders | 0 | 128 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 1189065 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 2600 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 1200 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 32 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 @ 3200MHz is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
