 |
Mali-G615 at 700 MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Full comparison data of Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Mali-G615 or Apple A16 Bionic.
Mali-G615 @ 700MHz vs Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G615 @ 700MHz |
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 3460 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Antutu v10 | 608459 | 994865 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22456 | 41258 | | | | | GFloPS | 1064 GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2408 MT/s | 1320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 84 GP/s | 42 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G615 @ 700MHz is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 6
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
