 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 950 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Detailed comparison data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 950 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 204591 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 7059 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 468.05 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 751 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 7.65 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 950MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
