 |
Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-08-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MC4 or Apple A11 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Shaders | 128 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 509737 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12756 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
