 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G52 MP2 at 614 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of GPUs in GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G52 MP2.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 614 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 211843 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 302.51 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 485 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 6.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 MP2 @ 614MHz is better: 0
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
