 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 at 820 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Detailed comparison data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G52 2EEMC2.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 820 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 2 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 195461 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 6674 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 404 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 648 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 6.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G52 2EEMC2 @ 820MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
