 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 at 900 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz, which GPU is better. Full compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G76 3EEMC4.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 900 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 296060 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 8159 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 279 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 516 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 5.45 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G76 3EEMC4 @ 900MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
