 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 at 600 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Hardcore benchmark examination data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G57 MP4.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 600 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 346612 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 8203 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 498 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 386 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 6.4 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP4 @ 600MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
