 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G72 MP4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G72 MP4.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 198765 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 0 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 184 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 117 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 3.6 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP4 @ 800MHz is better: 0
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
