 |
Mali-G68 MP5 at 950 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 08-03-2023
Detailed comparison data of Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz which GPU is better. Ultimate benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MP5 or Apple A11 Bionic.
Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 950 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 610701 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 0 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 1026 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 304 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 148 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MP5 @ 950MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
