 |
Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz vs Mali-G72 MP18 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 19-03-2021
Maximum benchmark testing data of Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G72 MP18 @ 850MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which GPU is better to buy Apple A11 Bionic or Mali-G72 MP18.
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz vs Mali-G72 MP18 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
Mali-G72 MP18 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 18 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 317965 | 212390 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 13931 | 9735 | | | | | GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | 519.97 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 486 MT/s | 1214 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.8 GP/s | 34.87 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Mali-G72 MP18 @ 850MHz is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
