 |
Mali-G78AE at 700 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 28-08-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, and how good the GPU are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G78AE or Apple A11 Bionic.
Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 700 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 24 | 6 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 732270 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19040 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 1158.77 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 2652 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 92.62 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G78AE @ 700MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
