 |
Adreno 642L at 550 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 22-08-2021
Full compare data of Adreno 642L @ 550MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Adreno 642L or Apple A11 Bionic.
Adreno 642L @ 550MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Adreno 642L @ 550MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 550 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 6 | | Shaders | 512 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 507648 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 16978 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 906.58 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 391 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 10.63 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Adreno 642L @ 550MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
