 |
PowerVR BXM-8-256 at 800 MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic at 2400 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-05-2022
Hardcore benchmark testing data of PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which GPU is better to buy PowerVR BXM-8-256 or Apple A11 Bionic.
PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz vs Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz |
Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2400 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Shaders | 256 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 10 nm | | Antutu v10 | 489653 | 317965 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 19845 | 13931 | | | | | GFloPS | 208 GFloPS | 396 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 642 MT/s | 486 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 10.8 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which PowerVR BXM-8-256 @ 800MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple A11 Bionic @ 2400MHz is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
